Dysport is the new injectable treatment for frown lines and wrinkles. Although it is made from the same neurotoxin (botulinum toxin type A) as Botox, there are some subtle differences between the two. Dysport is only new in the US as it has been used to smooth wrinkles in Europe for several years. It was originally developed in the 1990s to treat neuromuscular disorders. Just very recently, Dysport had the approval of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in the United States.

Botox is currently the most popular cosmetic procedure in the US and Dysport is poised to compete head to head with this market leader. The differences between Botox and Dysport are fairly small. Both drugs contain the same main ingredient: the botulism toxin. Like Botox, Dysport temporarily freezes the muscles that cause facial wrinkles. One of the main differences with Dysport is that its effect starts faster than Botox. Rather than waiting for a week to see results with Botox, Dysport begins to work in just a day or so. A second difference is that Dysport diffuses to a larger area when injected making it easier to treat such areas as the forehead and glabella.

One of the common misconceptions about Dysport is that it is 1/3 the strength of Botox. Untrue. Dysport comes in a 300-unit vial while Botox comes in 100 units. However, a one-to-one comparison between the two is like comparing apples to oranges due to the different dilution. Bottom line is as a patient, just because you need more units of Dysport than Botox does not mean that Dysport is an inferior product at all.

It is not quite clear yet as to whether Dysport will become as popular as Botox. If widespread clinical practice does show that Dysport is as good as Botox or better, it is unlikely than a lower price for Dysport will persist for long.

Katy Issa
Senior Aesthetician - Aura Laser Skin Care